‘Black African workers are retarded’ - Reits 4 State Prosecutor Johan Kruger

So, read between the lines; and don't expect an ignorant black African to be able to do so; is the message from State Pros. Johan kruger? Basically the Reits 4 State Prosecutor Johan Kruger says that if a white person in South Africa wants a ‘healthy’ relationship with a black person in South Africa; then in this ‘healthy’ relationship you must treat the black African like they are retarded.

Do not expect a black African to know what consent is. Do not expect a black African to take responsibility for thier consent and agreement to freely conduct a voluntary act; for which their was no pressure they participate in. Black Africans are moronically stupid, they do not know what consent is; because they are intellectually retarded. So it is your responsibility as a white person, to know that even if a black person tells you that they agree to do something; you are speaking to a retarded person, who is non compis mentis on the issue of consent. It is consequently your responsibility to be their adult (even if they are double your age; you as a young white person, are required to be their adult; because no matter how old a black African is; they are retarded and don't know what consent is; nor what a consensual honourable agreement is).

Not only do black Africans not know what consent is; or what it means to make an honourable consensual agreement; but they are also retarded in that they don't know what a joke is; or what satire is. Your ‘healthy’ relationship with a black person does not involve making a joke; because their retarded intellectual capacity does not allow them to be able to understand what a joke is. They will not understand your intentions to be a friend, to have a laugh together; that this is part of what in the rest of the world is considered a healthy relationship: to be able to laugh together and with each other.

So, the state Prosecutor implies that Black Africans are retarded; because they will never consider the possibility of the real motive of sincerity and friendship, when you joke with them; they will always conclude that your intentions are malicious. There is sweet fuck all you can do; it doesn't matter how honourable; or noble or kind your intentions were; they will interpret your intentions as the intent to insult them.

So, what you must do, is treat black Africans as if they are retarded; they are cognitively incapable of conscious consent; of making an honourable agreement; of understanding what satire and or humour contributes to a relationship.

The Reits-4 TRC Fraud Prostitution Circus:

1. Introduction: Politicians, Editors & Lawyers: Kangaroo Court Actors
   

2. Media Timeline of Events - Ignoring Anti-Lynching Voices
   

3. Ubuntu Kangaroo Court Justice – Evidence is Irrelevant
   

4. The Reasonable Initiation Satire Legal Fraud – Who cares about Evidence?
   

5. The Dolus Eventualis Legal Fraud – The Multiculti Boiling Frog
   

6. The Reconciliation Religious Fraud – Censoring TRC Fraud
   

7. What is Oprah's Position on Black Liberation Theology TRC Fraud?

A lynching is the practice of killing people by extrajudicial mob action, where a mob is generally considered to be more than five persons. The mob generally act under the pretext of service to justice, their race or tradition. They use lynching and other terror tactics to intimidate a particular racial, religious or cultural group into political, social or economic submission. A legal lynching has other names such as Stalin's Political Show trials, or Kangaroo Court Justice, etc.

The term show trial is a pejorative description of a type of highly public trial. The term was first recorded in the 1930s. There is a strong connotation that the judicial authorities have already determined the guilt of the defendant and that the actual trial has as its only goal to present the accusation and the verdict to the public as an impressive example and as a warning. Show trials exhibit scant regard for the principles of jurisprudence and even for the letter of the law. Defendants have little real opportunity to justify themselves.

Read more »

Radical Honesty SA: Re: SlutWalk & Conspiracy of Academic Silence on Do-Sluts-Want-to-be-Raped Research

WHAT REALLY TURNS PEOPLE ON? Men and women haven't been honest—with themselves or each other. What they say they like is often quite different from what they look for when nobody is watching. But how can we learn the truth? Two bold young neuroscientists have initiated a revolution in the scientific study of sexual attraction. Before Ogi Ogas and Sai Gaddam, the only researcher to systematically investigate sexual desires was Alfred Kinsey, who surveyed 18,000 middle-class Caucasians in the 1950s. But Ogas and Gaddam have studied the secret sexual behavior of more than a hundred million men and women around the world. Their method? They observed what people do within the anonymity of the Internet. [A Billion Wicked Thoughts] [Amazon] [The Female Sexual Brain]

Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 9:59 PM
Subject: Radical Honesty SA: Re: SlutWalk & Conspiracy of Academic Silence on Do Sluts Want to be Raped Research

TO: Sonya Barnett, Toronto SlutWalk;
TO: Darshika Selvasivam, VP York Fed. Of Students
TO: Rosemary Gartner, Univ. of Toronto Criminologist
TO: Christine Hakim & Anastasia Mandziuk, Osgoode Hall Law School
TO: Bill Blair, Toronto Police Chief;
CC: Pfc. Michael Sanguinetti; c/o Meaghan Gray, Toronto Police

Please find attached PDF:

Req. Your Position to: (I) the allegation in Psychology Today that Politically Correct Academic politics has prevented sexologists from taking an honest look at the true variety of women's fantasies; including the double standard in Sex Research that concludes that Female Sexual Fantasies of Rape do not under any circumstances imply they actually want to be raped; but male sexual fantasies of rape are treated as signs of pathology and as leading indicators of criminal intent; (II) Prof. Susan Fiske’s Princeton Univ. study, which found that when men see photo’s of half-naked women, their brain registers the women as sex objects to be acted upon; (III) If there is a difference in instinctual-sexual-predatory behaviour between a bull and ox; stallion and gelding; man and eunuch: Should Matadors who fly ‘red please-fuck-me-slut flags’ before bulls; be supported when they claim victimhood innocence?

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone
Radical Honesty SA

Read more »